CRB rule compliance feedback
#33100 from Rennie Clayton · No action required · Minutes (2022-11 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Your first Compliance Review request (letter #32264) was submitted on 2-14-22 and a response was
timely provided on 3-22-22. The Club Racing Board made it clear in the response that the proposed design was outside the
existing class philosophy. Although your second Compliance Review request on 4-12-22 (letter #32575) provided an altered
design, the drawings continued to show the same type of construction that the Club Racing Board had previously advised was
outside the class philosophy. Because of the revised design's potential to disrupt the class BoP and disenfranchise existing
competitors, the reviewers felt it warranted additional study, including, among other things, discussions with National Staff and
the full Club Racing Board. As noted in the 9-14-22 response to your second request, a decision was ultimately made to conduct
a survey to allow the Club Racing Board to determine affected competitors' views on either altering the direction of the class or
Show 4 more lines
recommending a rule change to maintain the existing class philosophy, which would render your proposed design noncompliant.
While you may feel this process took too long, please bear in mind that the reviewers are volunteers, and be advised that they
did their best, within personal time constraints, to evaluate your second request, chart an effective strategy, and prepare a
response.