Wording removed by a change is shown struck through, as in the original. 16 changes, 85 other letters.
#39691 from Greg Amy · Rule change · TB 26-02 (2026-02 Fastrack)
neutralTurbocharged and supercharged cars ineligible for IT classes unless explicitly listed.In GCR, Section 9.1.3.A Purpose, add the following:
"Turbocharged/Super charged cars are not eligible for Improved Touring competition unless explicitly listed."
#38965 from Steffen Clark · Rule change · TB 25-10 (2025-10 Fastrack)
neutralITA 90-93 Miata differential housing reinforcement clarified; 94-05 differential conversion and NB rear uprights now explicitly permitted.In ITA Spec Lines, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (90-93), change Notes as follows:
"Spec Miata floor pan modifications allowed. Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of
repairing or reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch.” The 90-93 Miatas may convert to the 94-05 differential
assembly. This conversion includes the driveshaft and half-shafts. NA 90-97 cars may use the OEM Mazda 99-05 (NB) model year
rear uprights. NA cars upgrading to the OEM Mazda NB rear uprights must use the NB rear uprights on both sides of the car,
Miss-matching of rear uprights is not allowed. Any final drive permitted so long as it fts in an unmodifed housing"
#38478 from Chris Dilluvio · Rule change · TB 25-08 (2025-08 Fastrack)
fasterITA Mazda MX-5 NA 90-97 may now use OEM NB 99-05 rear uprights instead of original 90-93 units.In ITA Spec Lines, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (90-93), change Notes as follows:
"Spec Miata floor pan modifications allowed. Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of
repairing or reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch.” The 90-93 Miatas may convert to the 94-05 differentialassembly. This conversion includes the driveshaft and half-shafts. The original 90-93 model rear suspension uprights must beretained. NA 90-97 cars may use the OEM Mazda 99-05 (NB) model year rear uprights. NA cars upgrading to the OEM Mazda NB
rear uprights must use the NB rear uprights on both sides of the car, Miss-matching of rear uprights is not allowed. Any final
drive permitted so long as it fts in an unmodifed housing."
#38075 from Gabriel Rodriguez · Rule change · TB 25-05 (2025-05 Fastrack)
neutralITA Honda Accord LX/EX 98-02 2254cc classified at 2700 lbs minimum weight.In ITA Spec Lines, classify Honda Accord LX/EX (98-02) as follows:
ITA Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ.
(cc)
Weight (lbs) Notes:
Honda Accord
LX/EX (98-02)
4 cyl SOHC 86x97
2254cc
2700
#35989 from Steffen Clark · Rule change · TB 24-06 (2024-06 Fastrack)
neutralITA 90-93 Miata may now use 94-05 differential assembly, driveshaft, and half-shafts with any permitted final drive ratio.ITA Spec Lines, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (90-93), add to notes the follows:
"The 90-93 Miatas may convert to the 94-05 differential assembly. This conversion includes the driveshaft and half-shafts. The
original 90-93 model rear suspension uprights must be retained. Any final drive permitted so long as it fits in an unmodified
housing."
Legends Car None.
#35854 from Andrew Fox · Rule change · TB 24-04 (2024-04 Fastrack)
neutralIT classes battery replacement rules relaxed; amp-hour capacity and weight restrictions removed.In GCR, Section 9.1.3.D.1.h., change as follows:
"Any ignition system which utilizes the original distributor for spark timing and distribution is permitted. Internal distributor
components and distributor cap may be substituted. Crankfire ignition systems are prohibited unless fitted as original
equipment. Any spark plugs and ignition wires may be used. Ignition timing is unrestricted. Batteries may be replaced with those
of alternate manufacture provided they are of similar amp-hour capacity and weight and are fitted in the standard location.
Additional battery hold-down devices may be used, and are strongly recommended. Cars originally equipped with two (2) 6-volt
batteries may replace them with one (1) 12-volt battery installed in either of the original battery locations."
#35163 from Jason Shulko · Rule change · TB 24-03 (2024-03 Fastrack)
neutralChevrolet Beretta 88–90 added to ITA classification with engine and weight specs.In ITA Spec Lines, classify Chevrolet Beretta (88 – 90) as follows:
ITA Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ.
(cc)
Weight (lbs) Notes:
Chevy Beretta (88
– 90)
#33130 from Improved Touring Committee · Rule change · TB 22-10 (2022-10 Fastrack)
neutralPorsche 944 (2V) (83-88) added to ITA at 2865 lbs; removed from ITS.In ITA Spec Lines, classify Porsche 944 (2V) (83-88) as follows:
ITA Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ.
(cc)
Weight (lbs) Notes:
A specification table follows in the original; it is not shown here.
#32441 from Kevin Duffy · Rule change · TB 22-07 (2022-07 Fastrack)
neutralPorsche 924S (86-88) classified ITA at 2865 lbs; Porsche 944 (2V) (83-88) classified ITS at 2865 lbs.In ITA Spec Lines, classify Porsche 924S (86-88) as follows:
ITA Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ. (cc) Weight (lbs) Notes:
Porsche 924S
(86-88)
4Cyl 100x78.9
2479
2865
In ITS Spec Lines, classify Porsche 944 (2V) (83-88) as follows:
ITS Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ. (cc) Weight (lbs) Notes:
A specification table follows in the original; it is not shown here.
#30376 from Andrew Fox · Rule change · TB 21-08 (2021-08 Fastrack)
neutralPorsche 944 2V 83-88 reclassified from ITS to ITA effective 2021-08-01.In ITA Spec Lines, classify Porsche 944 (2V) (83-88), as follows:
ITA Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ.
(cc)
Weight (lbs) Notes:
Porsche 944 (2V)
(83-88)
#30007 from Thomas Guest Jr. · Rule change · TB 21-03 (2021-03 Fastrack)
neutralToyota Camry 1987-91 4 Cyl DOHC 1998cc added to ITA at 2255 lbs minimum weight.Spec
Line Engine Series Max. Displ.
A specification table follows in the original; it is not shown here.
#28868 from Jose De Miguel · Rule change · TB 20-12 (2020-12 Fastrack)
slowerITA 92-95 Civic EX drops VTEC designation; both EX and Si specify D16Z6 engine.In ITA Spec Lines, 92-95 Civic EX, change as follows:
"Honda Civic EX Coupe/Sedan VTEC (92-95)"
In ITA, Spec Lines, 92-95 Civic EX, add to notes as follows:
"D16Z6 Engine"
In ITA, Spec Lines, 92-95 Civic Si, add to notes as follows:
"D16Z6 Engine"
#28898 from Robert Gary · Rule change · TB 20-12 (2020-12 Fastrack)
neutralITR Honda Accord V6 Coupe 03-05 and 06-07 newly classified at 3175 lbs minimum weight.In ITR, Classify the Honda Accord V6 Coupe (03-05) and (06-07) as follows:
ITR Engine Type Bore x Stroke(mm)/ Displ.
(cc)
Weight (lbs) Notes:
Honda Accord
Coupe V6 03-05
6 Cyl SOHC
(J30A4)
86.0 x 86.0 2997 3175
Honda Accord
Coupe V6 06-07
6 Cyl SOHC
(J30A5)
#28609 from Improved Touring Committee · Rule change · TB 20-05 (2019-05 Fastrack)
neutralImproved Touring traction control no longer requires disconnecting three wheel speed sensors, just disabled.In Improved Touring, GCR section 9.1.3.D.4.f, change as follows:
"Traction control, if available, must be disabled by disconnecting or removing a minimum of three wheelspeed sensors. Traction control must be disabled."
#26966 from LARRY FREY · Rule change · TB 19-09 (2019-09 Fastrack)
fasterITA Ford Escort ZX2 year range extended to 2003, minimum weight reduced to 2355 lbs.In ITA, Ford Escort ZX2 (98-00), change the year as follows:
“(98-00 03)”
In ITA, Ford Escort ZX2 (98-00 03), change the weight as follows:
"2400 2355"
#26237 from PRH Stark · Rule change · TB 19-05 (2019-05 Fastrack)
neutralIT classes renumber intake and fuel system rules under 9.3.1.D.1, clarify throttle linkage and electronic throttle restrictions.In GCR section 9.1.4.D.1 make changes and renumber as follows:
9.3.1.D.1. Reciprocating Engines (only)a. All air entering the intake tract shall pass through the carburetor or fuel injection air inlet(throttle body or bodies). All air must also pass through the stock air metering device, egMAF, or AFM, etc if so equipped. Air intake source shall be within the confines of the enginecompartment or stock location. (previously D.1.a.4)4. a. All air entering the intake tract shall pass through the carburetor or fuel injection air inlet
(throttle body or bodies). All air must also pass through the stock air metering device, eg
MAF, or AFM, etc., if so equipped. Air intake source shall be within the confines of the engine
compartment or stock location.3. b. The original, standard intake manifold shall be maintained. No porting or polishing of the
manifold is permitted except as allowed by rule D.1.I these rules.
c. Carbureted enginesa. 1. Any carburetor jets, needles, and/or metering rods may be used in the stock or
approved optional carburetor(s). Alternate needle valves are permitted. Removable
jets may be replaced or resized. The number of carburetors may not be changed
from standard. No venturi (including secondary or auxiliary) of any carburetor may be
modified in any way.1. 2. Certain cars have optional carburetors listed. On these cars, adaptor(s) may be
used to mount the optional carburetor(s), provided the adaptor serves no performance
function, i.e., plenum chamber, etc.2. 3. External throttle linkage to the standard or optional carburetor(s) may be modified
or changed. Choke mechanisms, plates, rods, and actuating cables, wires, or hoses
may be removed. Method of operating the secondary throttle may not be modified.
(previously D.1.a.2)5. 4. All single carbureted cars may fit an approved optional carburetor. Approved
optional carburetors are:
1 Weber 32 DGV/DGAV/DGEV
1 Weber 32/36 DGV/DGAV/DGEV
1 Weber 32/36 DFV/DFAV/DFEV
1 Weber 34 DAT/DATR/DATRA/DMTR
1 Holley-Weber 5200
Weber carburetor(s) with swaged fuel inlet fitting shall be replaced by drilling and
tapping the carburetor body for a threaded fitting. Fuel injection manifold(s) shall not
be replaced with carburetor manifold(s) from a different model, type, or engine size
in order to fit an optional carburetor. All cars equipped with multiple carburetors shall
run the original induction system, except for modifications allowed by the Authorized
Modifications Sections D.1.a., and D.1.a.2., above in these rules.
d. Fuel injected engines6. 1. The engine management computer may be altered or replaced. A throttle position
sensor and its wiring may be added or replaced. A MAP or MAF sensor and its wiring
may be added. Other existing sensors, excluding the stock air metering device, may be
substituted for equivalent units.2. External throttle linkage to the standard or optional carburetor(s) may be modified orchanged. Choke mechanisms, plates, rods, and actuating cables, wires, or hoses maybe removed. Method of operating the secondary throttle may not be modified.
2. External throttle linkage may be modified or changed. Electronic control of the
throttle is forbidden unless fit as stock. The method of operating any secondary throttle
may not be modified. Electronically actuated throttle bodies may not be replaced by
mechanical units unless specified on the vehicle’s spec line. Requests for alternate
throttle bodies will be considered on a case by case basis.6. 3. The engine management computer may be altered or replaced. A throttle position
sensor and
its wiring may be added or replaced. A MAP or MAF sensor and its wiring may be
added. Other
existing sensors, excluding the stock air metering device, may be substituted for
equivalent
units.7. 4. Wires and connectors in the engine wiring harness may be modified or replaced.
#40776 from Anthony Hernandez · Not recommended · Minutes (2026-10 Fastrack)
The 2003-2006 Pontiac Vibe GT and the 2003-2006 Toyota Matrix XRS both have too much horsepower to run in ITA, therefore it
will run in ITS at a weight of 2590 pounds.
#40101 from Ricardo Velez · Not recommended · Minutes (2026-05 Fastrack)
It is not allowed for the ignition timing to be converted to a non-distributor conversion as it goes against the IT philosophy of
remaining basically stock.
#39982 from John McFarland · No action required · Minutes (2026-05 Fastrack)
The specific models do not need to be called out specifically to include convertible models within the spec line. "Convertible
model cars are permitted provided they meet 9.3.18 and 9.4 requirements."
#39201 from Barry Borgschatz Jr · Not recommended · Minutes (2026-01 Fastrack)
ITE is a regional class and isn't under the national IT rules. Any changes would need to be submitted to the Division.
#39149 from Barry Borgschatz Jr · Not recommended · Minutes (2026-01 Fastrack)
ITE is a regional class and isn't under the national IT rules. Any changes would need to be submitted to the Division.
#39125 from Barry Borgschatz, Jr · No action required · Minutes (2026-01 Fastrack)
ITE is a regional class and isn't under the national IT rules. Any changes would need to be submitted to the Division.
#38599 from Nicole Hecker · No action required · Minutes (2025-08 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Your request is already covered in the GCR 9.1.3.9d. Lexan front windshield permitted with 20# weight
adder. Lexan rear window permitted with 20# weight adder. Any number of Lexan side windows permitted with 5# weight adder
Windshield clips and rear window straps per the GCR Section 9.3 Windshield Clips/Rear Window Straps, are permitted and
recommended.
#37932 from Jackxander Perez Silva · No action required · Minutes (2025-05 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The answer to question 1 is the entire transmission section of the IT general rules (section 5). Stock
transaxle housing, section a. No modification of the number of gears... section c.
Also, the general intent (way up at the top) states "competition adjustments, other than as outlined in section 9.1.3.C, are not
allowed. Other than those specifically allowed by these rules, no component or part normally found on a stock example of a
given vehicle may be disabled, altered, or removed." Changing the stock caliper to a different version would be considered
altered.
If the GCR rules doesn’t say it can be changed. it can't be changed.
A 25-pound adder means 25 pounds will be added to the GCR minimum weight if the windshield or rear glass is changed to
Lexan. If both are done, it will add 50 pounds to the minimum weight.
#37308 from Mike W Ogren · Not recommended · Minutes (2025-05 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #37277 in current Fastrack.
#37277 from Mike W Ogren · Not recommended · Minutes (2025-05 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The CRB is not interested in a nationally recognized regional ruleset for ITEZ.
#35721 from Barry Borgschatz · Taken care of · Minutes (2024-12 Fastrack)
Barry Borgschatz is being added to the IT Advisory Committee.
#36358 from Andrew Gamble · Not recommended · Minutes (2024-10 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board does not recommend this change. You can run a 200 treadwear tire in IT
currently.
#35063 from Jose de Miguel · Recommended to the Board · Minutes (2024-10 Fastrack)
In GCR Section 9.1.3.9.F, change as follows:
"Convertible soft-tops and attaching hardware shall be completely removed. Note: Convertible model cars are permitted if theywere only available as convertibles (e.g. MG Midget), or if the convertible model is specifically allowed on the vehicle speclineprov provided they meet 9.3.18 and 9.4. requirements. Convertible models may compete with their respective OEM or
aftermarket hardtop that retains the OEM silhouette. Rear glass in such hardtops may be of automotive safety glass or
polycarbonate material. All latches shall be replaced with positive fasteners. Manual and electric sunroofs, original oraftermarket, where the panel is not normally removable shall be retained and run in the closed position. Components (motors,cables, rails) may be removed provided the panel is securely retained. Removable sunroof or T-top may be retained if bolted or
welded in, or removed completely. Glass sunroofs must be removed. All sunroofs may be replaced with panel or replacementskin of the same material as the original surrounding roof material. All glass panels in the roof must be removed. Movable or
removable metal or composite panels in the roof may be either removed or positively secured in the closed position. Any
openings in the roof resulting from the removal of a panel must be covered with panels of stock contour made of the same
material as the stock surrounding roof structure."
#35571 from Club Racing Board · Member feedback requested · Minutes (2024-05 Fastrack)
Barry Borgschatz has been added to Improved Touring Advisory Committee.
DATE: April 20, 2024
#35120 from Gregg Ginsberg · Taken care of · Minutes (2024-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see response to letter #35062 in December Fastrack.
#35062 from Jose De Miguel · Not recommended · Minutes (2023-12 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The ITAC agrees that replacement glass for many of these cars is difficult if not impossible to obtain.
Regardless, the Lexan does represent a weight advantage thus the weight adder.
#33039 from Nicholas Boyeas · Recommended to the Board · Minutes (2023-11 Fastrack)
In GCR, Section 9.1.3.C.9.d., add the following:
“Lexan front windshield permitted with 20# weight adder. Lexan rear window permitted with 20# weight adder. Lexan side
window permitted with 5# weight adder. Windshield clips and rear window straps per the GCR Section 9.3 Windshield Clips/Rear
Window Straps, are permitted and recommended.”
#32277 from Tim Myers · No action required · Minutes (2022-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your feedback regarding 200TW tires, we will keep this in mind moving forward.
#32166 from Michael Paramore · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32159 from Eric Moye · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32143 from Hayes Lewis · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32142 from Hayes Lewis · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32141 from Hayes Lewis · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32134 from Willie Phee · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32109 from Rick Benazic · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32108 from Thomas Ciccone · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32096 from Charles Tanck · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Yes, if we were to implement this there would be language elsewhere in the GCR that would need to
be cleaned up. As it turns out, that is not necessary at this point. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32095 from Chris Dilluvio · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32092 from Ron Earp · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32089 from Steffen Clark · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32081 from John McFarland · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32073 from Anthony Biondo · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32072 from George Washburn · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32070 from Christopher Deen · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32069 from Matt Downing · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32067 from Jeff Giordano · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32066 from Scott Mackela · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32065 from Scott Mackela · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32062 from Carl Biondo · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32056 from Ben Slechta · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32053 from Robert Zatz · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#32028 from Emmitt Staley · Not recommended · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Chevrolet Cobalt SS is correctly classified in ITS. We cannot base spec line classifications on single
builds. We prefer not to classify a specific model in multiple classes, the classification process we use indicates that this car fits
best in ITS.
#32014 from Emmitt Staley · Not recommended · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Chevrolet Cobalt SS is correctly classified in ITS.
#31782 from Steve Elicati · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. And we mean that sincerely!
This issue has generated more member feedback than anything in recent memory. Some excellent points have been made both
for and against the change, and they have been noted. At the moment there really is no clear answer on which path is best.
The Committee has agreed that some of the issues that have been raised require additional research and discussion before we
can move forward. That work has already begun.
Possibly for that reason, although likely there were other considerations as well, the Competition Board has decided NOT to
move forward with the 200TW tire rule for Improved Touring at this time.
We certainly believe everyone involved, particularly all of you that felt strongly enough to reach out about this, ultimately have
the best interests of Improved Touring in mind. We are coming up on a very significant IT anniversary, and hopefully we can
celebrate it with larger car counts at events across the country.
Please don’t hesitate to continue to tell us what’s on your mind. We really are all in this together. Your ideas, support and even
thoughtful disagreement will help to keep us pointed in the right direction.
#31615 from Brendan Granitski · No action required · Minutes (2022-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see letter #31782 in current Fastrack.
#31765 from Anthony Biondo · Not recommended · Minutes (2022-02 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The car has been classed according to the Improved Touring Process.
The IT Operations Manual that describes the classification of cars can be found on the SCCA.COM website.
#31162 from Kirk Knestis · Recommended to the Board · Minutes (2022-02 Fastrack)
Effective 07/01/2022 In GCR section 9.1.3.D.8.a.7, change as follows:
"Original equipment wheels supplied by the manufacturer for the year(s), make, model andtrim level(s) of the car as listed onthe spec line may be used regardless of size unless notedotherwise on the vehicle’s spec line. Note that this allowance does NOTpermit the use oftires of a greater section width or aftermarket wheels of the stock size when larger than listedinD.7.1.a.6. Tires may not have a UTQG rating of less than 200."
#31477 from Frank Schwartz · No action required · Minutes (2021-12 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter.
#31080 from Ben Selig · Not recommended · Minutes (2021-11 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Vehicle specific allowances are not consistent with the Improved Touring philosophy.
#31079 from Ben Selig · Not recommended · Minutes (2021-11 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Vehicle specific allowances are not consistent with the Improved Touring philosophy.
#30351 from Steve Taylor · No action required · Minutes (2021-10 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. We have submitted a tech bulletin to include the Audi A3 in ITR at 2950#. Please note that Turbo cars
have only recently been allowed into Improved touring. The rules for turbo engines are very strict including stock turbo, stock
intercooler and charge piping, and stock ECU calibration. Please review ITCS 9.1.3.3 Turbocharged Engines for complete
regulations. Cars built to World Challenge or Continental/Koni Challenge etc. regulations will not be compliant in IT and should
be fielded in STU.
#30265 from Steffen Clark · Not recommended · Minutes (2021-08 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. We believe that the 1.6L NA Miata's minimum weight specification is appropriate as currently
classified.
#30053 from Michael Kamalian · Not recommended · Minutes (2021-02 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Your request is not within the philosophy of the rules. Aftermarket produced parts are allowed per the
rules provided they are direct replacement parts designed with exactly the same dimensions, type of internal parts, etc. as the
OEM part they replace.
#30027 from Anthony Depietto · No action required · Minutes (2021-02 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. All cars competing within Improved Touring should meet all ITCS regulations as found in GCR 9.1.3, no
further regulations are required. Any crossover competitor should be aware of this requirement and adhere to the
regulations. In the case where a competitor has presented an illegal car for competition, please use the procedure outlined in
GCR 8.3 PROTEST PROCEEDURES to protest the rule compliance of the car. We suggest identifying the cars from the entry list
ahead of time. We also suggest discussing the issue with your fellow Improved Touring competitors and entrants so that a
community response may be implemented.
#28983 from Ron Munnerlyn · Not recommended · Minutes (2020-12 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Your request is not within the class philosophy. IT does not allow modification or replacement of
major components of the vehicle such as the differential carrier /rear end. Differentials are available that fit the 1.6L NA Miata's
(e.g. Kaaz, OS Giken), where many cars classed in IT must resort to modified OEM or very rare and hard to find differentials. This
is part of the "warts and all" philosophy that keeps the IT rules simple and limited. Allowing such a modification opens the door
to similar such changes across the range of IT classifications and potentially cascading requests for other cross-platform bolt-
ons. That is unwanted, the change is inconsistent with the class philosophy, and the justification for the change isn't even a real
problem for the car.
No one requests a "no performance advantage" item because it has no performance benefit. The CRB does not recommend this
allowance.
#28819 from John Budrevic · No action required · Minutes (2020-12 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. ITE is a regional class operated under a number of rule sets at regional levels, not a national one
controlled by the ITCS. This car is certainly a candidate for catchall rules like ITE, SPO, etc., however does not fit the IT philosophy
or performance envelopes.
The Author is in Gainesville, FL, putting him in the SEDIV. Rules for their club racing regional classes can be found on the
divisional website sedivracing.com. SEDIV offers SPO for turbocharged cars like this one but it would not meet the safety
requirements of production or GT that the category requires. The direct link is as follows:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AltjwB8ZaEbIT5Ctkb5dLScUeFXojudW/view
#28826 from Louis Boustani · Not recommended · Minutes (2020-06 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Request is not consistent with current class philosophy.
#28441 from Lawrence Murdter · Not recommended · Minutes (2020-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The request does not align with the class philosophy of IT.
#27941 from chi ho · Not recommended · Minutes (2020-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The CRB believes the rule is correct at this time but will continue to keep the
request in mind for a review of the ITCS.
#26752 from James Bell · No action required · Minutes (2019-09 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. This matter has been resolved.
#28610 from Improved Touring Committee · Recommended to the Board · Minutes (2019-05 Fastrack)
In Improved Touring, GCR section 9.1.3.C, change as follows:
"During the initial vehicle classification process, the Club shall assess vehicle performance factors such as
– but not limited to – manufacturer’s published specifications for engine type, displacement,
horsepower, and torque; vehicle weight; brake type and size; suspension design; and aerodynamic
efficiency. Based only on such clearly measurable physical factors, a minimum allowable weight shall be
established. At the end of the second, third, and fourth full years of classification, the vehicle’s racingperformance relative to other vehicles in its class shall may be evaluated. If the Club deems that, in theinterest of fostering greater equity within a class, a vehicle should be reclassified to another Improved
Touring class, such a reclassification may be made. Alternatively or additionally, if the Club deems thatan upward or downward revision in the minimum allowable weight is warranted, such an adjustmentmay be made. At the end of a vehicle’s fourth full year of Improved Touring classification, the vehicle’sminimum weight shall be established. Cars with weights assigned prior to 1/1/2005 may have theirweights reassigned using the same process that is used for new listings. Should this occur, theassessment clock will start anew. Racing history of this particular model may be considered at this timeand an adjustment may be included in the new minimum weight, and the adjustment may bereconsidered at the end of any of the first four full years of competition. If at any time an error is
discovered in the physical factors used to assess a vehicle’s weight or an error was made during the
application of the weight-assignment process, the error may be corrected. Should such an errorcorrection occur, the assessment clock will start anew. Racing history of this particular model may be
considered at this time and a performance compensation adjustment may be included in the new
minimum weight, and the racing history of this model may be evaluated for an adjustment at the end ofany of the first four full years of competition after the correction is made. On rare occasion—and only
after careful review of the actual racing performance of a particular make/model/ year of vehicle—the
Club may reclassify a vehicle, revise a vehicle’s minimum allowable weight, and/or in the most extreme
situation an intake restrictor may be required. Such an action shall be taken solely for the purpose of
restoring equity within the vehicle’s class."
#26610 from PRH stark · No action required · Minutes (2019-05 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Please see response to letter #26237.
#26506 from Bruce Bettinger · Recommended to the Board · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
In ITS, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (99-00), add to notes as follows:
“Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of repairing or
reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch”.”
In ITS, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (01-05), add to notes as follows:
“Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of repairing or
reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch”.”
In ITA, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (90-93), add to notes as follows:
“Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of repairing or
reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch”.”
In ITA, Mazda MX-5 / Miata (94-97), add to notes as follows:
“Reinforcement of the differential housing ears is allowed for the purpose of repairing or
reducing breakage at the factory stress riser “notch”.”
#26364 from steve elicati · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26229 from Jon Rogers · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26211 from Raymond Blethen · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26149 from Jeff Baker · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26143 from Lee Graser · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26127 from Stephen Blethen · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26118 from Hayes Lewis · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26117 from James Ray · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26111 from Richard Grunenwald · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26109 from Vaughan Scott · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26108 from Chris Childs · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26104 from Matt Downing · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26103 from Steve Linn · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26101 from Richard Pannell · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26094 from Sean Duncan · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26093 from Joe Harlan · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26090 from Cameron Conover · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
calipers
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#26089 from John McFarland · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. The Club Racing Board appreciates your comments.
#25828 from Improved Touring Committee · No action required · Minutes (2019-04 Fastrack)
Thank you to those who wrote in responding to this What Do You Think. At this time,
membership does not support this idea.
#26328 from Jose De Miguel · No action required · Minutes (2019-03 Fastrack)
Thank you for your letter. Wheel diameter rules have been removed from the Improved
Touring category. All that is limited is wheel width and tire sizes as listed in 9.1.3.D.7 “Wheels/
Tires”.
#25828 from Improved Touring Committee · Member feedback requested · Minutes (2019-01 Fastrack)
The CRB is seeking your feedback on the following:
Allow any brake caliper up to 4 pistons to be used on any car in the ITCS. Brake master
cylinder and rotors would remain stock.
This is to take advantage of the availability and relatively low cost of pads as well as address
stock component shortages without introducing a significant change to the balance of
competition.
Please provide your feedback through crbscca.com.
#25661 from Raymond Blethen IV · No action required · Minutes (2019-01 Fastrack)
Thank you for your insights.